Cochran v. State
318 S.W.3d 769, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1115, 2010 WL 3394566
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Robert Cochran appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He claims his trial counsel and his appellate counsel were ineffective.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cochran v. State, 318 S.W.3d 769, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1115, 2010 WL 3394566 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
318 S.W.3d 769 (Cochran v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Jackson
318 S.W.3d 769 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)