Cochran v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cochran v. State

724 So. 2d 189, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 249

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 15, 1999·No. Nos. 97-3780, 97-4031·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these two consolidated direct criminal appeals, we reverse the restitution order, which directed appellants, jointly and severally, to pay $29,860.97 to the State of Florida, and remand with directions that the trial court enter an amended order directing appellants to pay $1,089.30 in restitution. See Glaubius v. State, 688 So.2d 913 (Fla.1997) (the loss or damage which may be compensated for by restitution must be either directly or indirectly related to the' defendant’s offense). In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and BROWNING, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In these two consolidated direct criminal appeals, we reverse the restitution order, which directed appellants, jointly and severally, to pay $29,860.97 to the State of Florida, and remand with directions that the trial court enter an amended order directing appellants to pay $1,089.30 in restitution. See Glaubius v. State, 688 So.2d 913 (Fla.1997) (the loss or damage which may be compensated for by restitution must be either directly or indirectly related to the' defendant’s offense). In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and BROWNING, JJ., Concur.

Cochran v. State, 724 So. 2d 189, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 249 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

724 So. 2d 189 (Cochran v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related