Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cochran v. State

Cochran v. State

592 So. 2d 784, 1992 WL 12312
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 29, 1992·No. 91-1471·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

592 So.2d 784 (1992)

Kenneth COCHRAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 91-1471.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 29, 1992.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Robert Friedman, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Jacqueline Barakat, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant's sentence, founded on an erroneously scored guideline, is reversed. Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 1991); Carter v. State, 586 So.2d 340 (Fla. 1991). We recognize that the mandated rescoring will not alter the permitted range of sentencing. Nevertheless, it cannot be assumed here that the change in score might not impact the exercise of the court's discretion.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cochran v. State, 592 So. 2d 784, 1992 WL 12312 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

592 So. 2d 784 (Cochran v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Madrigal v. State
683 So. 2d 1093 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Thomas v. State
659 So. 2d 404 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Bendel v. State
613 So. 2d 613 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)