Cochran v. State
This text of 592 So. 2d 784 (Cochran v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kenneth COCHRAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Robert Friedman, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Jacqueline Barakat, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appellant's sentence, founded on an erroneously scored guideline, is reversed. Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 1991); Carter v. State, 586 So.2d 340 (Fla. 1991). We recognize that the mandated rescoring will not alter the permitted range of sentencing. Nevertheless, it cannot be assumed here that the change in score might not impact the exercise of the court's discretion.
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
592 So. 2d 784, 1992 WL 12312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cochran-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.