Cochran v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cochran v. State

427 So. 2d 1125, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27946

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cochran v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 460 So. 2d 542 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 15, 1983·No. No. 83-243·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that appellant is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. See Harvin v. State, 385 So.2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Loconte v. State, 382 So.2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Seymour v. State, 359 So.2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Thornton v. State, 354 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Sec. 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1978); Rule 9.140(b) Fla.R.App.P.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that appellant is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. See Harvin v. State, 385 So.2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Loconte v. State, 382 So.2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Seymour v. State, 359 So.2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Thornton v. State, 354 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Sec. 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1978); Rule 9.140(b) Fla.R.App.P.

Cochran v. State, 427 So. 2d 1125, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27946 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

427 So. 2d 1125 (Cochran v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related