Cochran v. Scott

3 Wend. 229
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1829·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Marcy, J.

It was not necessary to set forth the names of the persons composing the firm of Lawrence Power and company, they being neither plaintiffs nor defendants in the suit. If the plaintiff derives his title to a note through a firm, he is not required to state in his declaration the names of the persons composing it. (8 Wheaton 642. 3 Chitty’s Pl. 35.)

There is a still stronger reason, if possible, for overruling this demurrer. The declaration contains several counts, and the demurrer is put in to the whole ; the assigned cause of demurrer applies to only one count, and the sufficiency of the other counts is not questioned.

Judgment for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cochran v. Scott, 3 Wend. 229 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

3 Wend. 229 (Cochran v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Budd v. Wilkinson
5 Blackf. 264 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1840)
Stout v. Hicks
5 Blackf. 49 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1838)
Vermont v. Society for the Propagation of the Gospel
28 F. Cas. 1155 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont, 1827)