Cochran v. Schwarzweiss

89 S.E. 348, 18 Ga. App. 150, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 187
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 24, 1916
Docket6776
StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E. 348 (Cochran v. Schwarzweiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cochran v. Schwarzweiss, 89 S.E. 348, 18 Ga. App. 150, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 187 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The verdict is authorized by the evidence; no material error of law is made to appear; and the court did not err in refusing a new trial. • Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E. 348, 18 Ga. App. 150, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cochran-v-schwarzweiss-gactapp-1916.