Cochran v. Mount Vernon Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cochran v. Mount Vernon Trust Co.

245 A.D. 724

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

While we are of the opinion that the first, second and fourth causes of action are insufficient, as defendant moved by a general notice of motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety, the sufficiency of the third cause of action justified the denial of the motion. (Eidlitz v. Fishbach & Moore, Inc., 239 App. Div. 483; White v. Slayback, 190 id. 108.) Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

While we are of the opinion that the first, second and fourth causes of action are insufficient, as defendant moved by a general notice of motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety, the sufficiency of the third cause of action justified the denial of the motion. (Eidlitz v. Fishbach & Moore, Inc., 239 App. Div. 483; White v. Slayback, 190 id. 108.) Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Cochran v. Mount Vernon Trust Co., 245 A.D. 724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

245 A.D. 724 (Cochran v. Mount Vernon Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related