Cochran v. Minter
73 S.E. 551, 10 Ga. App. 337, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 493
This text of 73 S.E. 551 (Cochran v. Minter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cochran v. Minter, 73 S.E. 551, 10 Ga. App. 337, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 493 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).
Opinion
The first grant of a new trial by the judge of the superior court, on certiorari to review a verdict and judgment in a justice’s court, will not be disturbed, unless the verdict was demanded by the evidence. If a verdict was demanded at all, it was demanded in favor of the defendant, and not for the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hancock v. Allen
116 S.E. 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Tomberlin v. Barber
101 S.E. 196 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Taylor v. Mutual Benefit Industrial Life Ass'n of America
92 S.E. 1012 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Rowland v. Bell
76 S.E. 995 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
73 S.E. 551, 10 Ga. App. 337, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cochran-v-minter-gactapp-1912.