Cochran v. Minter
73 S.E. 551, 10 Ga. App. 337, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 493
Opinion
The first grant of a new trial by the judge of the superior court, on certiorari to review a verdict and judgment in a justice’s court, will not be disturbed, unless the verdict was demanded by the evidence. If a verdict was demanded at all, it was demanded in favor of the defendant, and not for the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cochran v. Minter, 73 S.E. 551, 10 Ga. App. 337, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 493 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).
73 S.E. 551 (Cochran v. Minter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hancock v. Allen
116 S.E. 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Tomberlin v. Barber
101 S.E. 196 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Taylor v. Mutual Benefit Industrial Life Ass'n of America
92 S.E. 1012 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Rowland v. Bell
76 S.E. 995 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)