Cochran v. Medallion Plastering Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Cochran v. Medallion Plastering Co.

207 So. 2d 274

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedFebruary 21, 1968

DocketNo. 36952

StatusPublished

This text of 207 So. 2d 274 (Cochran v. Medallion Plastering Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cochran v. Medallion Plastering Co., 207 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Indus-tiral Commission bearing date October 26, 1967..

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI