Cochran v. Levy

263 A.D. 921, 32 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7373
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 21, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 263 A.D. 921 (Cochran v. Levy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cochran v. Levy, 263 A.D. 921, 32 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7373 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

Petitioner was a candidate in the competitive examination for license of first assistant in modem foreign languages in New York city high schools. In the written examination he received less than a passing mark but was within the consideration zone and was permitted to continue with the remaining parts of the test. In the interview test, however, he failed in two items, namely, oral German and mental equipment. This test was given by two assistant examiners, both of whom rated petitioner unsatisfactory. He was entitled to and did receive a second interview test, with the same result, and was accordingly denied a license. He appealed to the board of examiners for further consideration and, after careful consideration, each member of the board of examiners voted to deny the petition. He had a second appeal with the same results. He then appealed to the Commissioner of Education and had a very extensive hearing and oral arguments. This was conducted before Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner Cole. After all this evidence was taken, Commissioner Graves returned to duty and took up the matters and went over all the proof and consulted with Commissioner Cole, who had been present at the hearing and gave full faith and credit to all the evidence introduced, and the Commissioner of Education made a decision dismissing the appeal. This decision was fully warranted by the record and was not capricious, arbitrary or unreasonable and is, therefore, final so far as this court is concerned. The appellant has failed to show any evidence that the decision by the Commissioner was lacking in proper proof to sustain it. Order appealed from dismissing petition unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ. [175 Misc. 666.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Education v. Nyquist
78 Misc. 2d 544 (New York Supreme Court, 1974)
Valachovic v. Nyquist
68 Misc. 2d 33 (New York Supreme Court, 1971)
Board of Education of Central School District No. 2 v. Nyquist
60 Misc. 2d 967 (New York Supreme Court, 1969)
Carson v. Nyquist
59 Misc. 2d 577 (New York Supreme Court, 1969)
Lubell v. Nyquist
31 A.D.2d 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
Gottfried Baking Co. v. Allen
45 Misc. 2d 708 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Douglas v. Allen
43 Misc. 2d 35 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Board of Education of Central School District No. 2 v. Allen
14 A.D.2d 429 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Board of Education v. Allen
6 Misc. 2d 453 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Ross v. Wilson
284 A.D. 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 A.D. 921, 32 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cochran-v-levy-nyappdiv-1942.