Cochran v. Hays
This text of 8 Ky. Op. 503 (Cochran v. Hays) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
One of fhe grounds specified in the notice to1 contest the election held in the Pine Tavern district in Bullitt county, to determine [504]*504whether the sale of intoxicating liquors should be prohibited in said district, is that the judges at said election failed to open the polls at six o’clock A. m. The other is that there were fraudulent votes cast against said proposition. We are not aware of any law authorizing the contest of an election of this character, if, indeed, a mere test of the opinions or wishes of the qualified voters of a district on any given question can be called an election according to the statutory definition of the word.
But besides that objection, appellants have failed to show any just grounds of complaint. They assume, as a matter of law, that the officers of an election are required to open the polls by six o’clock a. m., when the constitutional provision on the subject is that all elections by the people shall be held between the hours of six o’clock in the morning and seven o’clock in the evening. Sec. 16, Art. 8, Const, of Kentucky. The election complained of was commenced between six and seven o’clock in the morning, certainly, according to the evidence, not later than seven o’clock in the morning, and was continued until seven o’clock in the evening, which was a compliance with the law.
There is no evidence that there were fraudulent votes cast for or against the proposition.
The judgment must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Ky. Op. 503, 1875 Ky. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cochran-v-hays-kyctapp-1875.