Cochran v. Deboo

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 5, 2008
Docket08-8130
StatusUnpublished

This text of Cochran v. Deboo (Cochran v. Deboo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cochran v. Deboo, (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8130

LARRY COCHRAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

KUMA DEBOO, Warden; BUREAU OF PRISONS; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:08-cv-00126-JPB-JSK)

Submitted: November 19, 2008 Decided: December 5, 2008

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Cochran, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Larry Cochran, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Cochran v. Deboo, No. 3:08-cv-00126-JPB-

JSK (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 22, 2008). We deny the motion for

preparation of a transcript at government expense and dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cochran v. Deboo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cochran-v-deboo-ca4-2008.