Cochran v. Davis

20 Ga. 581
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 15, 1856
DocketNo. 106
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 20 Ga. 581 (Cochran v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cochran v. Davis, 20 Ga. 581 (Ga. 1856).

Opinion

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.

delivering the opinion.

pL] As to the exception to the process, we do not think it •comes within the reason of the decisions made by this Court •as to original process.

[2.] But be that as it may, the Inferior Court, at the first term to which this case was made returnable, decided, upon this objection being taken, that the omission by the Clerk to sign the copy process was amendable, and accordingly the defect was cured, and did not, in fact, exist at the subsequent term when the motion was made to quash the proceeding.

The Court had jurisdiction, and no exception was taken to the judgment thus rendered. While that judgment stands it is the law of this case, whether right or wrong.

[3.] As to the alleged error in permitting the plaintiff to prove the entries made by the Clerk, who was beyond the jurisdiction of the Court, conceding that this proof was made against the consent of the defendant’s Counsel, there were two other witnesses who established the same fact — and being one about which there was no controversy, and the case not falling under the New Trial Act of 1853, -’4, we see no reason for remanding the cause for a re-hearing, on account of •this supposed irregularity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brantley v. Sawyer
169 S.E.2d 55 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)
McRae v. Boykin
35 S.E.2d 548 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
Washington County v. . Blount
31 S.E.2d 374 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)
Harris v. Taylor
98 S.E. 86 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)
Lyon v. Baldwin
160 N.W. 428 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1916)
Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Pritchard
51 S.E. 424 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Hayashi v. Iwata
14 Haw. 627 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1903)
Neal-Millard Co. v. Owens
42 S.E. 266 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Pritchett v. Commissioners of Bartow County
19 S.E. 896 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1894)
Lassiter v. Carroll
13 S.E. 825 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1891)
Duer v. Thweatt
39 Ga. 578 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1869)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Ga. 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cochran-v-davis-ga-1856.