Cochran v. Commonwealth
This text of 275 S.W. 810 (Cochran v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court by
Reversing.
The indictment in this case, charging appellant with wife desertion, is endorsed “a true bill,” but this is not signed by the foreman of the grand jury, as is required by section 119 of the Criminal Code.
This provision is mandatory, and the trial court erred in overruling the demurrer to the indictment, as is conceded by the attorney general. Oliver v. Commonwealth, 95 Ky. 372, 25 S. W. 600; Commonwealth v. L. & N. R. Co., 32 S. W. 136; Lewis v. Commonwealth, 48 S. W. 977; Terrell v. Commonwealth, 194 Ky. 608, 240 S. W. 81.
Wherefore, the judgment of conviction .is reversed, and the cause remanded for proceedings not inconsistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 S.W. 810, 210 Ky. 332, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cochran-v-commonwealth-kyctapphigh-1925.