Cochran v. Cochran

412 So. 2d 436, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29197
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 14, 1982
DocketNo. 81-983
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 412 So. 2d 436 (Cochran v. Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cochran v. Cochran, 412 So. 2d 436, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29197 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. In our view the trial court’s order denying the appellant’s motion for relief from judgment should be affirmed because the trial court had previously entered an order denying a motion for new trial on the same grounds, and an appeal from that order was dismissed. The appellant was not entitled to relitigate the same issue a second time.

ANSTEAD, HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cummings v. State
412 So. 2d 436 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
412 So. 2d 436, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cochran-v-cochran-fladistctapp-1982.