Cocciola v. Wood-Dickerson Supply Co.
This text of 44 So. 541 (Cocciola v. Wood-Dickerson Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The bill avers a joint, contract between Louis and Jennie E. Cocciola, the defendants, and C. H. Rast, and the proof shows that tlie contract was with L. Cocciola alone with said Rast. This was a clear variance between the allegations and proof, which defeats a recovery of so much of the claim of the plaintiff for materials as was furnished by complainants, to said Rast, and for that part of the claim the bill cannot be sustained.
The decree below will be corrected, and one will be here rendered, disallowing that part of the claim for materials furnished said Rast, and affirming it as to the amount agreed on for the materials furnished to the defendants, Louis and Jennie E. Cocciola, allowed by the court below.
Corrected, rendered in part, affirmed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 So. 541, 152 Ala. 283, 1907 Ala. LEXIS 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cocciola-v-wood-dickerson-supply-co-ala-1907.