Coca-Cola Company-Foods Division v. Davis

546 So. 2d 93, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1593, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3836, 1989 WL 74840
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 6, 1989·No. No. 88-2500·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ZEHMER, Judge.

Employer/carrier seeks to appeal an order in which the deputy commissioner found that the claimant sustained a com-pensable accident, but reserved jurisdiction to determine the benefits to which claimant is entitled. We do not have jurisdiction to review this non-final order. See La Croix Construction Co. v. Bush, 431 So.2d 712 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); State, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Waters, 416 So.2d 903 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Mills Electrical Contractors v. Marthens, 417 So.2d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); The Wash House v. Tucker, 413 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); General Electric Co. v. Hawkins, 413 So.2d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice to review the order in the event of an appeal from a final order awarding benefits.

WENTWORTH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coca-Cola Company-Foods Division v. Davis, 546 So. 2d 93, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1593, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3836, 1989 WL 74840 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

546 So. 2d 93 (Coca-Cola Company-Foods Division v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Boom & Barrier, Inc. v. Stewart
592 So. 2d 1178 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)