Coca-Cola Company-Foods Division v. Davis

546 So. 2d 93, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1593, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3836, 1989 WL 74840
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 6, 1989
DocketNo. 88-2500
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 546 So. 2d 93 (Coca-Cola Company-Foods Division v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coca-Cola Company-Foods Division v. Davis, 546 So. 2d 93, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1593, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3836, 1989 WL 74840 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

ZEHMER, Judge.

Employer/carrier seeks to appeal an order in which the deputy commissioner found that the claimant sustained a com-pensable accident, but reserved jurisdiction to determine the benefits to which claimant is entitled. We do not have jurisdiction to review this non-final order. See La Croix Construction Co. v. Bush, 431 So.2d 712 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); State, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Waters, 416 So.2d 903 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Mills Electrical Contractors v. Marthens, 417 So.2d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); The Wash House v. Tucker, 413 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); General Electric Co. v. Hawkins, 413 So.2d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice to review the order in the event of an appeal from a final order awarding benefits.

WENTWORTH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Boom & Barrier, Inc. v. Stewart
592 So. 2d 1178 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
546 So. 2d 93, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1593, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3836, 1989 WL 74840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coca-cola-company-foods-division-v-davis-fladistctapp-1989.