Coca-Cola Co.—Foods Division v. Isenhour

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Coca-Cola Co.—Foods Division v. Isenhour

429 So. 2d 1356, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20736

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 21, 1983

DocketNo. AL-15

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 429 So. 2d 1356 (Coca-Cola Co.—Foods Division v. Isenhour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coca-Cola Co.—Foods Division v. Isenhour, 429 So. 2d 1356, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20736 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Coca-Cola, a self-insured employer, appeals a workers’ compensation order finding it responsible for Isenhour’s attorney’s fee. We affirm.

It is clear that without the services of his attorney Isenhour would have been considered 25% permanently partially disabled. Due to his attorney’s efforts, Isenhour received additional treatment, additional temporary total disability, and is classified as permanently totally disabled. A fee is clearly due, Section 440.34, Florida Statutes (1975).

The amount was properly based on the criteria set forth in Lee Engineering v. Fellows, 209 So.2d 454 (Fla.1965).

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI