Coca-Cola Co.—Foods Division v. Isenhour

429 So. 2d 1356, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20736
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 21, 1983·No. No. AL-15·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Coca-Cola, a self-insured employer, appeals a workers’ compensation order finding it responsible for Isenhour’s attorney’s fee. We affirm.

It is clear that without the services of his attorney Isenhour would have been considered 25% permanently partially disabled. Due to his attorney’s efforts, Isenhour received additional treatment, additional temporary total disability, and is classified as permanently totally disabled. A fee is clearly due, Section 440.34, Florida Statutes (1975).

The amount was properly based on the criteria set forth in Lee Engineering v. Fellows, 209 So.2d 454 (Fla.1965).

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coca-Cola Co.—Foods Division v. Isenhour, 429 So. 2d 1356, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20736 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

429 So. 2d 1356 (Coca-Cola Co.—Foods Division v. Isenhour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bassett's Dairy v. Thomas
429 So. 2d 1356 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)