Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Everett

108 So. 2d 545, 234 Miss. 882, 1959 Miss. LEXIS 563
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided January 19, 1959·No. No. 40989·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hall, J.

The appellant appeals from a judgment against it in favor of the appellee for damages for a decomposed roach in a bottle of Coca-Cola.

The declaration was not based upon a breach of warranty but upon negligence. But, in either case, the burden was upon appellee to show that the appellant manufactured the beverage in question.

The appellee produced no proof whatsoever as to the manufacturer of the beverage and, consequently, the requested peremptory instruction should have been granted.

Therefore, the judgment of the lower court will have to be reversed and a judgment entered here in favor of the appellant.

Reversed and judgment here for appellant.

Fioberds, P. J., and Arrington, Ethridge, and Gillespie, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Everett, 108 So. 2d 545, 234 Miss. 882, 1959 Miss. LEXIS 563 (Mich. 1959).

108 So. 2d 545 (Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Everett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hart v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
188 N.E.2d 817 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1963)