Coburn v. Weed

12 Kan. 182
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJuly 15, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 12 Kan. 182 (Coburn v. Weed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coburn v. Weed, 12 Kan. 182 (kan 1873).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

The action below was for the foreclosure of a mortgage, and the error complained of is the taxing of an attorney’s fee in the judgment. It is objected that the question should first have been raised by motion in the district court. It has been settled otherwise. (Lender v. Caldwell, 4 Kas., 339.) The judgment was entered by default. The mortgage was not made a part of the petition, nor does it appear in the record, and there is no allegation of any contract or stipulation to pay attorney’s fees. Hence it was error to render any judgment for such fees. (Stover v. Johnnycake, 9 Kas., 367.) The allegation in the petition, that “fifty dollars is a reasonable attorney’s fee for the foreclosure,” and “that there is now due and remaining unpaid on said note and mortgage $516.65, besides $50 attorney’s fees accruing in this action,” is no allegation of an agreement to pay fees.

The judgment of the district court will be modified by striking out the attorney fee of fifty dollars. The costs of this court will be taxed against Orlando Weed, the party who obtained judgment for the attorney fee.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tacha v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
155 P. 922 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1916)
Stanard v. Sampson Et Ux.
1909 OK 13 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)
Franklin Opera House Co. v. Armstrong
133 F. 417 (First Circuit, 1904)
Smith v. Mortgage & Debenture Co.
101 F. 956 (Fifth Circuit, 1900)
Earlywine v. Topeka, Salina & Western Railway Co.
43 Kan. 746 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1890)
Jennings v. McKay
19 Kan. 120 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1877)
Dorman v. Crozier
14 Kan. 224 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Kan. 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coburn-v-weed-kan-1873.