Coburn v. Foster's Services for Funerals, LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Coburn v. Foster's Services for Funerals, LLC

518 S.W.3d 233, 2017 WL 1149610, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 251

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 28, 2017

DocketNo. 104662

StatusPublished

This text of 518 S.W.3d 233 (Coburn v. Foster's Services for Funerals, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coburn v. Foster's Services for Funerals, LLC, 518 S.W.3d 233, 2017 WL 1149610, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 251 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Chakita Coburn (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state her claims against Foster’s Services for Funerals and Ozella J. Foster-Robinson (“Respondents”) for interference with the right of sepulcher, emotional distress, misrepresentation, and breach of a professional duty. On appeal, Appellant argues she sufficiently stated claims, and the trial court, therefore, erred in dismissing Appellant’s claims.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Chakita Coburn (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state her claims against Foster’s Services for Funerals and Ozella J. Foster-Robinson (“Respondents”) for interference with the right of sepulcher, emotional distress, misrepresentation, and breach of a professional duty. On appeal, Appellant argues she sufficiently stated claims, and the trial court, therefore, erred in dismissing Appellant’s claims.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

518 S.W.3d 233, 2017 WL 1149610, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coburn-v-fosters-services-for-funerals-llc-moctapp-2017.