Coburn v. . Barnhill
This text of 141 S.E. 569 (Coburn v. . Barnhill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action of the trial court in holding that the credits, derived from dividends and sale of collateral, entered on the note in suit by the Martin County Savings and Trust Company, after the maker had denied liability and repudiated ownership of the stock' attached as collateral, did not repel the bar of the statute, must be upheld on authority of what was said in Nance v. Hulin, 192 N. C., 665, 135 S. E., 774, where the pertinent decisions are collated and distinguished, with special reference to Bank v. King, 164 N. C., 303, 80 S. E., 251, cited and relied upon by appellant. It would only be a matte? of repetition to state again what has been so recently said in this case.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
141 S.E. 569, 195 N.C. 239, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coburn-v-barnhill-nc-1928.