Coburn Trolley-Track Manuf'g Co. v. McCabe Manuf'g Co.

80 F. 915, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 3028
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedApril 8, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 80 F. 915 (Coburn Trolley-Track Manuf'g Co. v. McCabe Manuf'g Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coburn Trolley-Track Manuf'g Co. v. McCabe Manuf'g Co., 80 F. 915, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 3028 (circtsdny 1897).

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

This suit is brought upon patent Ho. 455,695, dated July 7, 1891, and granted to William J. Sumner for a door hanger. The specification states:

“This invention relates to improvements in sliding doors, which are suspended through trolley carriers and hangers from a trolley track thereabove, whereby they may slide longitudinally or alongside of the wall or partition,— the main object of the invention being to provide means, comprised in and between the hanger and the door, whereby the said door may be laterally adjusted, in order that it may be supported to be slid in a plane at any desired proximity to the partition in which is formed the doorway to be covered and closed by s-aid door; and the invention consists in the constructions and combinations of parts, all substantially as will hereinafter fully appear and be set forth in the claims. The hanger consists of a longitudinal bar, to extend between and beyond and to rest on the axles of two roller carriers, and posts connected to and vertically suspended from and below said bar, being interme[916]*916diately decreased in thickness, to permit of its free passage in the opening between the troughways of the trolley track, and provided at its extremity with an enlargement whereby shoulders are formed, and said enlargement is transversely and horizontally bored and screw-threaded.
“The door at its upper side is provided with apertures therein, each having a contracted opening at its top, formed by overlying edges, and also open at one end, but closed at the other end by a wall. The head of each post suspended from the trolley track fits into the correspondingly formed apertures, being entered thereinto at the end thereof, and a screw passes, loosely through a hole in the said end wall and with a screw engagement into the transverse tapped hole in the post enlargement. It being understood that the hanger posts are practically incapable of any lateral movement, it will be plain that, on turning the said screw (which is to be maintained against endwise movement), the said door will be moved laterally either towards or from the partition, according as said screw is turned to the right or to the left.”

The claim in question is for:

“(1) In combination, the trolley track, roller carriers supported thereon, and a hanger supported from said roller carriers, comprising suspension posts hav[917]*917mg terminal enlargements, and the door formed or equipped at its upper portion with transversely extending apertures and contracted openings leading therefrom to the top of the door, and in which apertures said post enlargements are entered for engagemént, and an operating screw applied for securing a movement of said door laterally with relation to said suspension posts, substantially as set forth.”

These things had been subjects of many patents before, including several granted to Sumner, leaving but narrow room for improvements, which have been shown in defense; and of these No. 869,451, dated September 6, 1887, and granted to William 0. Kasson, is relied upon as an anticipation. The drawings of this- patent show a track with roller carriages, slotted plates, d, at the top corners of the door, with U-shaped lugs, d', at their outer ends, hangers or suspension posts or “limbs,” reaching from the carriages through the slots in these plates, and screws, e, working through the lugs and engaging the limbs. The specification sets forth, after descriptions of various other parts:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lettelier v. Mann
91 F. 909 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California, 1899)
Coburn Trolley Track Mfg. Co. v. McCabe Mfg. Co.
83 F. 1021 (Second Circuit, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 F. 915, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 3028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coburn-trolley-track-manufg-co-v-mccabe-manufg-co-circtsdny-1897.