Cobo v. Walgreen Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cobo v. Walgreen Co.

104 So. 3d 392, 2013 WL 85444, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 275

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 9, 2013

DocketNo. 3D12-635

StatusPublished

This text of 104 So. 3d 392 (Cobo v. Walgreen Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cobo v. Walgreen Co., 104 So. 3d 392, 2013 WL 85444, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 275 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Narbona v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 851 So.2d 226, 226 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (affirming order disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment benefits where there was “substantial, competent evidence to support the finding that the [claimant] voluntarily left his employment without good cause attributable to his employer when he remained away from work longer than his scheduled leave without informing his employer of his status”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Narbona v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 851 So.2d 226, 226 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (affirming order disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment benefits where there was “substantial, competent evidence to support the finding that the [claimant] voluntarily left his employment without good cause attributable to his employer when he remained away from work longer than his scheduled leave without informing his employer of his status”).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 So. 3d 392, 2013 WL 85444, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cobo-v-walgreen-co-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack