Cobleigh v. Spring

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Cobleigh v. Spring

157 A. 886, 85 N.H. 560, 1932 N.H. LEXIS 128

DecidedJanuary 5, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 157 A. 886 (Cobleigh v. Spring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cobleigh v. Spring, 157 A. 886, 85 N.H. 560, 1932 N.H. LEXIS 128 (N.H. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The bill cannot be maintained. It is the duty of the probate court to make the decree of distribution. P. L., c. 307, s. 6. The superior court cannot interfere with the exercise of that jurisdiction. Rockwell v. Dow, ante, 58 and cases cited. The decree of the probate court will fully protect the plaintiff, and consequently he cannot invoke the direction of the superior court.

Demurrer sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The bill cannot be maintained. It is the duty of the probate court to make the decree of distribution. P. L., c. 307, s. 6. The superior court cannot interfere with the exercise of that jurisdiction. Rockwell v. Dow, ante, 58 and cases cited. The decree of the probate court will fully protect the plaintiff, and consequently he cannot invoke the direction of the superior court.

Demurrer sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 A. 886, 85 N.H. 560, 1932 N.H. LEXIS 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cobleigh-v-spring-nh-1932.