Coble v. Wilkins

Fourth Circuit

Coble v. Wilkins

475 F. App'x 17

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 1, 2012·No. No. 12-1463·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ernest Franklin Coble, Jr., appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his action brought pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Coble v. Wilkins, No. 1:11-cv-00211-JAB-JEP, 2012 WL 1450047 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ernest Franklin Coble, Jr., appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his action brought pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Coble v. Wilkins, No. 1:11-cv-00211-JAB-JEP, 2012 WL 1450047 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Coble v. Wilkins, 475 F. App'x 17 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

475 F. App'x 17 (Coble v. Wilkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related