Cobham v. . Mosely

3 N.C. 6
CourtSuperior Court of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 5, 1797
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 6 (Cobham v. . Mosely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cobham v. . Mosely, 3 N.C. 6 (N.C. Ct. App. 1797).

Opinion

2'cr Curiam.

Williams and Haywood.

After the point bad-beeu reserved and argued, the latter words of this conversation., admit the debt has never been paid ; the former admit the defendants signature. An admission oí the signature, it is true, is no admission of the debt; for still it may be usurious, a gaming debt, or the money may have been paid, or il may be Under some other circumstances which render it not a just debt r. but when he says Rosser ought to pay it, I will speak to him about it — -this shews the debt is not paid; and though he says at the same time, 5 will not pay it — yet being legally due from him, the law will compel him to pay it.

There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.C. 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cobham-v-mosely-ncsuperct-1797.