Cobham v. Folkes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cobham v. Folkes

265 A.D.2d 445, 696 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10422

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 18, 1999·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lisa, J.), dated July 30, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred by the one-year Statute of Limitations.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint as time-barred by the one-year Statute of Limitations set forth in CPLR 215 (3) (see, e.g., Friedman v Gallinelli, 240 AD2d 699). Bracken, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lisa, J.), dated July 30, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred by the one-year Statute of Limitations.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint as time-barred by the one-year Statute of Limitations set forth in CPLR 215 (3) (see, e.g., Friedman v Gallinelli, 240 AD2d 699). Bracken, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cobham v. Folkes, 265 A.D.2d 445, 696 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10422 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

265 A.D.2d 445 (Cobham v. Folkes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related