Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Cobham v. Folkes

Cobham v. Folkes

265 A.D.2d 445, 696 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10422
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 18, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 445 (Cobham v. Folkes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cobham v. Folkes, 265 A.D.2d 445, 696 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10422 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lisa, J.), dated July 30, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred by the one-year Statute of Limitations.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint as time-barred by the one-year Statute of Limitations set forth in CPLR 215 (3) (see, e.g., Friedman v Gallinelli, 240 AD2d 699). Bracken, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Friedman v. Gallinelli
240 A.D.2d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D.2d 445, 696 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cobham-v-folkes-nyappdiv-1999.