Cobb v. Yelich

118 A.D.3d 1235, 988 N.Y.S.2d 297

This text of 118 A.D.3d 1235 (Cobb v. Yelich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cobb v. Yelich, 118 A.D.3d 1235, 988 N.Y.S.2d 297 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with using a controlled substance after his urine twice tested positive for the [1236]*1236presence of THC. He was found guilty of the charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, with a modified penalty. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, positive urinalysis results, related documentation and hearing testimony provide substantial evidence supporting the determination (see Matter of Cagle v Fischer, 108 AD3d 913, 913 [2013]; Matter of Sutton v Prack, 107 AD3d 1250, 1250 [2013]). Further, the request for urinalysis form and the testimony of the correction officers involved established that petitioner’s urine sample was properly secured and that there was an unbroken chain of custody over the urine sample (see Matter of Polite v Goord, 22 AD3d 1000, 1001 [2005]; Matter of Saif’Ul’Bait v Goord, 15 AD3d 703, 704-705 [2005]). We reject petitioner’s contention that he was improperly denied the testimony of certain witnesses, as such testimony would have been redundant (see Matter of Cody v Fischer, 84 AD3d 1651, 1651-1652 [2011]; Matter of Warren v Fischer, 63 AD3d 1466, 1467 [2009]). Petitioner’s remaining claims, including his assertion that the Hearing Officer was biased against him, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Peters, PJ., Lahtinen, McCarthy, Garry and Clark, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saif'Ul'Bait v. Goord
15 A.D.3d 703 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Polite v. Goord
22 A.D.3d 1000 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Warren v. Fischer
63 A.D.3d 1466 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Cody v. Fischer
84 A.D.3d 1651 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Sutton v. Prack
107 A.D.3d 1250 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Cagle v. Fischer
108 A.D.3d 913 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 A.D.3d 1235, 988 N.Y.S.2d 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cobb-v-yelich-nyappdiv-2014.