Cobb v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cobb v. State

929 S.W.2d 317, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1587, 1996 WL 537001

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 24, 1996

DocketNo. 69312

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 929 S.W.2d 317 (Cobb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cobb v. State, 929 S.W.2d 317, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1587, 1996 WL 537001 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Lester Cobb, appeals from the judgment of Jefferson County Circuit Court denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Lester Cobb, appeals from the judgment of Jefferson County Circuit Court denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

929 S.W.2d 317, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1587, 1996 WL 537001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cobb-v-state-moctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack