Cobb v. State
775 So. 2d 390, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16136, 2000 WL 1807500
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cobb v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 825 So. 2d 1080 →
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See McKnight v. State, 616 So.2d 31 (Fla.1993) (adopting the Second District Court of Appeal’s rationale in King v. State, 597 So.2d 309, 314 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), that the trial court has discretion “to exercise leniency and to sentence a defendant found to be an habitual felony offender or an habitual violent felony offender to a sentence less severe than the maximum sentence that is permitted by subsections 775.084(4)(a) or (b)”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cobb v. State, 775 So. 2d 390, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16136, 2000 WL 1807500 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
775 So. 2d 390 (Cobb v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
King v. State
597 So. 2d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)