Cobb v. State
This text of Cobb v. State (Cobb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
CHARLES COBB, § § No. 490, 2014 Petitioner Below, § Appellant, § Court Below–Superior Court of § the State of Delaware in and for v. § New Castle County § STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Respondent Below, § C.A. No. N14M-06-016 Appellee. §
Submitted: October 9, 2014 Decided: October 13, 2014
ORDER
This 13th day of October 2014, it appears to the Court that:
(1) The appellant, Charles Cobb, filed this appeal from the Superior
Court’s order of August 4, 2014, denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
On September 25, 2014, the appellee, State of Delaware, filed a motion to dismiss
the appeal as moot.1
(2) Cobb has not responded to the State’s motion to dismiss. Under the
Supreme Court Rules, Cobb’s failure to respond to the motion is deemed to be his
consent to the dismissal of the appeal.2
1 See Del. Supr. Ct. R. 29(b), 30(d) (providing for dismissal of appeal upon motion by a party). 2 See Del. Supr. Ct. R. 3(b)(2), 30(c) (providing that a party’s failure to respond to a motion to dismiss is deemed to be the party’s consent to dismissal). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules
3(b)(2), 29(b) and 30(b), (c), that the appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Henry duPont Ridgely Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cobb v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cobb-v-state-del-2014.