Cobb v. Milchrist Sanders

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Cobb v. Milchrist Sanders

1915 OK 637, 151 P. 852, 51 Okla. 186, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 947

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 14, 1915

Docket5013

StatusPublished

This text of 1915 OK 637 (Cobb v. Milchrist Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cobb v. Milchrist Sanders, 1915 OK 637, 151 P. 852, 51 Okla. 186, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 947 (Okla. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

DEVEREUX, C.

This case was docketed in this court on April 14, 1913, and was submitted on July 5, 1915, and the plaintiff in error filed his brief on June 18, 1915, but no service thereof was made on the defendants in error, as required by rule 7 of this court. On July 27, .1915, an order was made, directing the plaintiff in error to serve the briefs on the defendants in error in 10 days, and the record in the clerk’s office shows that *187 notice of this order was given to the plaintiff in error on the same day. This order has not been observed by the plaintiff in error, and no service of the briefs has been made.

We therefore recommend that the brief of the plaintiff in error be stricken from the files, and the appeal dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

DEVEREUX, C.

This case was docketed in this court on April 14, 1913, and was submitted on July 5, 1915, and the plaintiff in error filed his brief on June 18, 1915, but no service thereof was made on the defendants in error, as required by rule 7 of this court. On July 27, .1915, an order was made, directing the plaintiff in error to serve the briefs on the defendants in error in 10 days, and the record in the clerk’s office shows that *187 notice of this order was given to the plaintiff in error on the same day. This order has not been observed by the plaintiff in error, and no service of the briefs has been made.

We therefore recommend that the brief of the plaintiff in error be stricken from the files, and the appeal dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1915 OK 637, 151 P. 852, 51 Okla. 186, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cobb-v-milchrist-sanders-okla-1915.