Cobb v. Landmark First National Bank of Fort Lauderdale
406 So. 2d 1210, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22261
This text of 406 So. 2d 1210 (Cobb v. Landmark First National Bank of Fort Lauderdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cobb v. Landmark First National Bank of Fort Lauderdale, 406 So. 2d 1210, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22261 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
Opinion
Affirmed on the authority of Lamb v. Schmitt, 285 U.S. 222, 52 S.Ct. 317, 76 L.Ed. 720 (1932) and Chauvin v. Dayon, 14 A.D.2d 146, 217 N.Y.S.2d 795 (1961).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lamb v. Schmitt
285 U.S. 222 (Supreme Court, 1932)
Chauvin v. Dayon
14 A.D.2d 146 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
406 So. 2d 1210, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cobb-v-landmark-first-national-bank-of-fort-lauderdale-fladistctapp-1981.