Cobb v. Jolley

116 S.E. 553, 30 Ga. App. 48, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 240
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 7, 1923
Docket14094
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 116 S.E. 553 (Cobb v. Jolley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cobb v. Jolley, 116 S.E. 553, 30 Ga. App. 48, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 240 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Where the owner of land gives to a broker, for a valuable consideration, a written option, for a named number of days, to sell his land at a certain fixed price, the owner cannot lawfully withdraw the option during the life of the contract. And the broker’s commissions are earned if, during the life of the option, he finds a purchaser ready, able, and willing to buy, and who actually offers to buy, the land on the terms stipulated by the owner. Civil Code (1910), § 3587; Simpson v. Sanders, 130 Ga. 265, 270 (60 S. E. 541), and citations.

2. Under the above ruling the court erred in charging the jury as complained of in the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, and this error necessitates another trial of the case.

Judgment reversed.

Isuhe and Bloodworth, JJ., conour. S. Holderness, Smith & Christian, for plaintiff. Boyl'in & Boylcin, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hargrett v. Jolley
130 S.E. 602 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 S.E. 553, 30 Ga. App. 48, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cobb-v-jolley-gactapp-1923.