Cobb v. Fisher

121 Mass. 169, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 321
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 27, 1876·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

The writing, signed by the former owner of the land flowed, bound him personally, as a release of his own claim for pecuniary damages. Seymour v. Carter, 2 Met. 520. Smith v. Goulding, 6 Cush. 154. But it could not bind the land, nor estop subsequent grantees of the land to recover damages for the flowing thereof in the future, because it was not under seal. Fitch v. Seymour, 9 Met. 462. Stevens v. Stevens, 11 Met. 251. Craig v. Lewis, 110 Mass. 377. Snow v. Moses, 53 Maine, 546. Acording to the terms of the report the verdict for the respond ent must be set aside, and a

Verdict entered for the complainant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cobb v. Fisher, 121 Mass. 169, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 321 (Mass. 1876).

121 Mass. 169 (Cobb v. Fisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. Vest
126 Ala. 355 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1899)
Burnett v. Commonwealth
48 N.E. 758 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
Eisenbach v. Hatfield
12 L.R.A. 632 (Washington Supreme Court, 1891)
Warren v. Carey
12 N.E. 999 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1887)
Isele v. Schwamb
131 Mass. 337 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1881)