Cobb v. Cobb

399 So. 2d 479
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 9, 1981
DocketWW-379
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 399 So. 2d 479 (Cobb v. Cobb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cobb v. Cobb, 399 So. 2d 479 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

399 So.2d 479 (1981)

Glenwood Brooks COBB, Appellant,
v.
Molly Ann COBB, Appellee.

No. WW-379.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 9, 1981.

*480 Bill A. Corbin, Blountstown, for appellant.

Robert B. Staats, Panama City, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant failed to make payments on certain household furnishings awarded to appellee pursuant to a final decree of dissolution. The Circuit Court found that the furnishings had been awarded to appellee "not as any settlement of property rights between the parties but upon a marital duty of the husband to the wife," and further found that appellant had the ability to pay for the furnishings but wilfully refused to do so. Consequently, the court ordered appellant to make satisfactory arrangements with the creditor within 30 days or be incarcerated in the county jail for a period not exceeding 90 days.

Appellant now urges that this order was erroneous, as the Florida Constitution prohibits incarceration for nonpayment of a debt. Florida Constitution, Art. I, § 11 (1968). Despite this constitutional prohibition, however, contempt proceedings may be used to enforce the payment of court-ordered alimony because of the public necessity that dependents be supported. Chapman v. Lamm, 388 So.2d 1048 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Gersten v. Gersten, 281 So.2d 607 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). The trial court held a hearing at which testimony was taken and determined that the award sought to be enforced here arose out of a marital duty. Nothing in the record before this court contradicts that determination; and the order below is, accordingly, AFFIRMED.

McCORD, BOOTH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gieseke v. Gieseke
508 So. 2d 54 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Pabian v. Pabian
480 So. 2d 237 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
McCombes v. McCombes
440 So. 2d 683 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Loury v. Loury
431 So. 2d 701 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
399 So. 2d 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cobb-v-cobb-fladistctapp-1981.