Cobb v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cobb v. City of Miami

254 So. 2d 376, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5738

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 26, 1971

DocketNo. 71-73

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 254 So. 2d 376 (Cobb v. City of Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cobb v. City of Miami, 254 So. 2d 376, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5738 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-plaintiff Ardith Cobb seeks review of a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in a trial as to damages only (liability having been determined by summary judgment) in an automobile negligence action.

For reversal she claims that the $4,000.-00 jury verdict was unreasonable in view of special damages in the form of medical-hospital bills of $8,849.73, exclusive of pain and suffering. It is undisputed, however, that appellant had suffered injuries from several prior automobile accidents.

The test to be applied in determining the adequacy of a verdict is whether a jury of reasonable men could have returned the verdict. Boeck v. Diem, Fla.App.1971, 245 So.2d 687. Based on the record herein, we cannot say that the ver-diet awarded could not have been returned by a jury of reasonable men. One quite reasonable hypothesis is that the medical bills and pain and suffering were not wholly attributable to the accident then being litigated. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI