Cobb v. Bond

148 S.E. 411, 39 Ga. App. 637, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 476
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 9, 1929
Docket19451
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 148 S.E. 411 (Cobb v. Bond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cobb v. Bond, 148 S.E. 411, 39 Ga. App. 637, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 476 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinions

Broyles, C. J.

The petition as amended was subject to general demurrer, and the trial judge of the municipal court of Atlanta properly so held. The reversal of that ruling by the appellate division of the court was error; and the judge of the superior court erred in sustaining the decision of the appellate division and in overruling the defendant’s petition for certiorari. See, in this connection, Town of Decatur v. Jaudon, 136 Ga. 854 (72 S. E. 351).

Judgment reversed.

Dulce and Bloodworih, JJ., concur. Edgar Laihctm, for plaintiff in error. Brown & Brown, J. Wiglvtman Bowden, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey v. Martin
112 S.E.2d 807 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 S.E. 411, 39 Ga. App. 637, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cobb-v-bond-gactapp-1929.