COBB, ROOSEVELT v. SHEAHAN, MICHAEL

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 31, 2015
DocketCA 14-00431
StatusPublished

This text of COBB, ROOSEVELT v. SHEAHAN, MICHAEL (COBB, ROOSEVELT v. SHEAHAN, MICHAEL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
COBB, ROOSEVELT v. SHEAHAN, MICHAEL, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1245 CA 14-00431 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF ROOSEVELT COBB, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MICHAEL SHEAHAN, SUPERINTENDENT, FIVE POINTS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

ROOSEVELT COBB, PETITIONER-APPELLANT PRO SE.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARCUS J. MASTRACCO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Seneca County (Dennis F. Bender, A.J.), entered December 26, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment denied and dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition challenging his sentence as calculated by the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, we conclude that DOCCS correctly computed his sentence and, thus, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition (see generally Matter of Williams v Annucci, 131 AD3d 1329, 1330-1331). To the extent that petitioner contends that he was denied the benefit of his plea bargain, his remedy is to seek relief by way of a motion pursuant to CPL article 440 (see Matter of Cristostomo v Fischer, 93 AD3d 976, 977).

Entered: December 31, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Williams v. Annucci
131 A.D.3d 1329 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Cristostomo v. Fischer
93 A.D.3d 976 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
COBB, ROOSEVELT v. SHEAHAN, MICHAEL, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cobb-roosevelt-v-sheahan-michael-nyappdiv-2015.