Coatings, Inc. v. National Cold Drawn, Inc.

625 F. Supp. 1418, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30781
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coatings, Inc. v. National Cold Drawn, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 611 F. Supp. 958
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin·Decided January 7, 1986·No. Civ. A. No. 85-C-89·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR STAY

REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.

The third party defendant, Abcor Steel Co., has moved this court for an order staying these proceedings as to it, or in the alternative, staying the entire action. On July 2, 1985, 611 F.Supp. 958 this court rendered a decision and order that denied a similar motion on the part of the original defendant, National Cold Drawn, Inc. Ab-cor has also failed to convince the court that a stay is appropriate. For the reasons stated in this court’s order of July 2, 1985, the motion is denied.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the third party defendant’s motion for a stay of these proceedings is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coatings, Inc. v. National Cold Drawn, Inc., 625 F. Supp. 1418, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30781 (E.D. Wis. 1986).

625 F. Supp. 1418 (Coatings, Inc. v. National Cold Drawn, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coatings, Inc. v. National Cold Drawn, Inc.
611 F. Supp. 958 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1985)