Coates v. State
This text of 513 So. 2d 757 (Coates v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the conviction for grand theft and the sentence imposed. The trial court did not err in finding that the property taken, a moped over 5 brake horsepower, is a motor vehicle as defined in section 322.-[758]*75801(2), Florida Statutes (1985), and not a moped as defined in section 316.003(2), Florida Statutes (1985).
As a motor vehicle, the moped is presumed to have value pursuant to section 812.014(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1986), and the trial court was correct in so instructing the jury. No other instruction as to the value of the moped was necessary.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
513 So. 2d 757, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2381, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coates-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.