Coates v. Mayor of Baltimore

475 F. App'x 853
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 23, 2012
DocketNo. 12-1358
StatusPublished

This text of 475 F. App'x 853 (Coates v. Mayor of Baltimore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coates v. Mayor of Baltimore, 475 F. App'x 853 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jennifer Coates appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore and individual defendants Kimberly Washington and Stephanie Rawl-ings-Blake in this employment discrimination action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp.2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Coates v. The Mayor & City Council of Balt., No. 1:10-cv-03419-JKB, 2012 WL 502958 (D.Md. Feb. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 2000e-2000e-17
42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2000e-17
§ 2000e
42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
475 F. App'x 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coates-v-mayor-of-baltimore-ca4-2012.