Coates v. Mayor, Aldermen, & Commonalty of New York

7 Cow. 584
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1827
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases

This text of 7 Cow. 584 (Coates v. Mayor, Aldermen, & Commonalty of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coates v. Mayor, Aldermen, & Commonalty of New York, 7 Cow. 584 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).

Opinion

On error from C. P. of the city and county of New York. The action in the court below was debt by the corporation of the city of New York against Coates, for the penalty of a by-law.

[585-1]*585-1The declaration recited parts of the charter of the city; and the statute of April 9th, 1813, (2 E. L. 445, s. 267,) relating to the city ; which provides as follows: “ That the mayor, aldermen and commonalty of the said city, in common council convened, shall have full power and authority to make and pass such by-laws and ordinances, as they shall from time to time, deem proper and necessary, for regulating, or, if they shall find it necessary, preventing the interring of the dead within the said city.” That *the act also authorized the imposition of a penalty for violating the by-law, not exceeding $250, recoverable in debt by the corporation. That on the 7th October, 1823, “ at, &c., at a meeting and assemblage of the said common council" duly held and convened, was passed a law entitled, &c., in and by which said by-law or ordinance it was ordained, among other provisions, that no person shall dig or open any grave, &c, in any burying ground, cemetry or church-yard, or in any other part or place in this city, which lies to the southward of a line commencing at the centre of Canal street on the ¡North Eiver, and running through the centre of Canal street, &c., to the East Eiver* or shall inter or deposit, or cause &c., in any such grave, or in any vault or tomb, any dead body within the limits aforesaid, under the penalty of $250 for every such offence.” That after the passing of this by-law, and before the commencement of this suit, to wit, on the 10th day of April, 1824, Coates, the defendant below, did inter or deposit a body in a vault or tomb, in what is commonly called the Trinity Church-yard, in the first ward of the city, to the southward of the line mentioned in the by-law, &c. By means, whereof, &c.

Plea, that the place in which the interment took place, is part of a close called Trinity Church-yard, situate in the first ward of the city of ¡New York, mentioned, &c., in certain letters patent, dated May 6th, A. D. 1697, granted under the authority of William 3d, king of Great Britain, &c., whereby divers persons were constituted a body corporate, by the name of The Eector and Inhabitants of the city of ¡New York, in communion of the Protestant Episcopal [586]*586churcl/ of England.” That the letters patent confirmed to that corporation, and to their successors for ever, the piece of land, as and for a church-yard, cemetery and burying place, with &c., the rights, customs, fees, perquisites, profits, &c., as the same were then in the possession of that corporation. That at, and immediately after the grant, the land was appropriated and used by the corporation as a cemetery and burying place, for the interment of dead bodies within the same, at and for certain fees, *perquisites and profits, then and there charged, demanded, taken and received for such interments respectively, to the use and benefit of the corporation. That the rectors, church-wardens and vestrymen of Trinity Church, are the same corporation with the one before described, having all their rights in respect' to the locus in quo. That at the time when the dead body was interred or deposited in the vault or tomb mentioned, the defendant was the sexton, and in the service and employment of Trinity Church; and, as such, had the charge or custody of the vault or tomb ; and with the leave and license of this corporation, entered and deposited the dead body as he lawfully might

General demurrer and joinder.

The following causes were also on error from the same court, upon a declaration similar to the above in each.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
505 U.S. 1003 (Supreme Court, 1992)
Moritz v. United Brethrens Church
199 N.E. 29 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)
State Ex Rel. Oil Service Co. v. Stark
122 S.E. 533 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1924)
Piper v. Ekern
194 N.W. 159 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1923)
Clarke v. Keating
183 A.D. 212 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)
Washington v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
71 S.E. 1066 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)
Portland v. Cook
87 P. 772 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1906)
Odd Fellows' Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San Francisco
73 P. 987 (California Supreme Court, 1903)
Wygant v. McLauchlan
54 L.R.A. 636 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1901)
Boise City v. Boise Rapid Transit Co.
59 P. 716 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1899)
Gushee v. City of New York
42 A.D. 37 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Michigan Tel. Co. v. City of Charlotte
93 F. 11 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan, 1899)
Aurora & Geneva Railway Co. v. Harvey
53 N.E. 331 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1899)
State v. Mayor of Englewood
40 A. 653 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1898)
Ex parte Bohen
47 P. 55 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
Mayor of Newark v. Watson
56 N.J.L. 667 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1894)
Board of Com'rs v. Young
59 F. 96 (Sixth Circuit, 1893)
Rowland v. Miller
15 N.Y.S. 701 (Superior Court of New York, 1891)
People ex rel. Oak Hill Cemetery Ass'n v. Pratt
14 N.Y.S. 551 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Cow. 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coates-v-mayor-aldermen-commonalty-of-new-york-nysupct-1827.