Coastline of Indian Creek Inc. v. Levinson

867 So. 2d 418, 2003 WL 22956123
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 17, 2003·No. No. 3D02-2774·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Without reaching any of the other issues presented, we conclude, on the appeal, that attorney’s fees were properly denied but, on the cross-appeal, that costs were improperly granted because the application under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 was untimely served more than the thirty days after the judgment provided by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.525. See Gulf Landings Ass’n, Inc. v. Hershberger, 845 So.2d 344 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Wentworth v. Johnson, 845 So.2d 296 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coastline of Indian Creek Inc. v. Levinson, 867 So. 2d 418, 2003 WL 22956123 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

867 So. 2d 418 (Coastline of Indian Creek Inc. v. Levinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saia Motor Freight Line, Inc. v. Reid
888 So. 2d 102 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Alexander v. Penske Logistics, Inc.
867 So. 2d 418 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)