Coastline Distributing Co. v. Equilease Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Coastline Distributing Co. v. Equilease Corp.

278 So. 2d 683, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8113

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 12, 1973

DocketNo. 72-1202

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 278 So. 2d 683 (Coastline Distributing Co. v. Equilease Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coastline Distributing Co. v. Equilease Corp., 278 So. 2d 683, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8113 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the rule stated in Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Fla.1970, 231 So.2d 193; Automatic Canteen Company of America v. Butler, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 712. As to appellant’s contention that the contract sued upon was one of guarantee, this point need not be decided by reason of the holding in Anderson v. Trade Winds Enterprises Corp., Fla.App. 1970, 241 So.2d 174.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the rule stated in Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Fla.1970, 231 So.2d 193; Automatic Canteen Company of America v. Butler, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 712. As to appellant’s contention that the contract sued upon was one of guarantee, this point need not be decided by reason of the holding in Anderson v. Trade Winds Enterprises Corp., Fla.App. 1970, 241 So.2d 174.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 So. 2d 683, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coastline-distributing-co-v-equilease-corp-fladistctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack