Coastline Distributing Co. v. Equilease Corp.
278 So. 2d 683, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8113
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 1973·No. No. 72-1202·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Affirmed upon the rule stated in Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Fla.1970, 231 So.2d 193; Automatic Canteen Company of America v. Butler, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 712. As to appellant’s contention that the contract sued upon was one of guarantee, this point need not be decided by reason of the holding in Anderson v. Trade Winds Enterprises Corp., Fla.App. 1970, 241 So.2d 174.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coastline Distributing Co. v. Equilease Corp., 278 So. 2d 683, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8113 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).
278 So. 2d 683 (Coastline Distributing Co. v. Equilease Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cooke v. Cooke
278 So. 2d 683 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)