Coastal Hill Rural Preservation v. Cnty. of Sonoma

California Supreme Court

Coastal Hill Rural Preservation v. Cnty. of Sonoma

383 P.3d 1105, 210 Cal. Rptr. 3d 14

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 22, 2016

DocketS237655

StatusPublished

This text of 383 P.3d 1105 (Coastal Hill Rural Preservation v. Cnty. of Sonoma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coastal Hill Rural Preservation v. Cnty. of Sonoma, 383 P.3d 1105, 210 Cal. Rptr. 3d 14 (Cal. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition for review is granted. The matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division One, for reconsideration in light of Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. San Mateo County Community College District et al. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 937, 957-959, footnote 6, 207 Cal.Rptr.3d 314, 378 P.3d 687, and California Code of Regulations, title 14, section 15384. The request for an order directing depublication of the opinion in the above entitled appeal is granted. The Reporter of Decisions is directed not to publish in the Official Appellate Reports the opinion in the above entitled appeal filed August 31, 2016, which appears at 2 Cal.App.5th 1234, 207 Cal.Rptr.3d 160. (Cal. Const., art. VI, section 14 ; rule 8.1125(c)(1), Cal. Rules of Court.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition for review is granted. The matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division One, for reconsideration in light of Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. San Mateo County Community College District et al. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 937, 957-959, footnote 6, 207 Cal.Rptr.3d 314, 378 P.3d 687, and California Code of Regulations, title 14, section 15384. The request for an order directing depublication of the opinion in the above entitled appeal is granted. The Reporter of Decisions is directed not to publish in the Official Appellate Reports the opinion in the above entitled appeal filed August 31, 2016, which appears at 2 Cal.App.5th 1234, 207 Cal.Rptr.3d 160. (Cal. Const., art. VI, section 14 ; rule 8.1125(c)(1), Cal. Rules of Court.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

383 P.3d 1105, 210 Cal. Rptr. 3d 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coastal-hill-rural-preservation-v-cnty-of-sonoma-cal-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack