Coast Co. v. Borough of Spring Lake

58 N.J. Eq. 586
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJuly 1, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 58 N.J. Eq. 586 (Coast Co. v. Borough of Spring Lake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coast Co. v. Borough of Spring Lake, 58 N.J. Eq. 586 (N.J. 1899).

Opinion

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Van Syokel, Gummere, Ludlow, Nixon, Hendrickson, Adams — 8.

For reversal — Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Bogert — 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bridgewater Twp. v. Raritan
65 A.2d 861 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Barcus v. Blanchard
39 A.2d 499 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
City of Sturgeon v. Wabash Railway Co.
17 S.W.2d 616 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 N.J. Eq. 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coast-co-v-borough-of-spring-lake-nj-1899.