Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights v. Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedAugust 18, 2025
Docket25-5289
StatusPublished

This text of Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights v. Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security (Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights v. Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights v. Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, (D.C. Cir. 2025).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5289 September Term, 2024 1:25-cv-00872-JMC Filed On: August 18, 2025 Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, et al.,

Appellees

v.

Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, et al.,

Appellants

BEFORE: Henderson, Childs, and Pan, Circuit Judges

ORDER

Upon consideration of the emergency motion for a stay pending appeal, which includes a request for an immediate administrative stay, it is

ORDERED that the district court’s August 1, 2025 order be administratively stayed pending further order of the court insofar as it may have the effect of precluding the government from initiating expedited removal proceedings pursuant to 8 C.F.R. §§ 1.2 and 235.3(b)(1)(i). However, this administrative stay does not apply insofar as the district court’s order prohibits the government from applying expedited removal to former parolees who have been continuously present in the United States for longer than two years. Appellants do not seek a stay pending appeal to the extent the district court’s order has that effect. The purpose of this administrative stay is to give the court sufficient opportunity to consider the emergency motion for stay pending appeal and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of that motion or the scope of the district court’s order. See D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 33 (2025). It is United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5289 September Term, 2024

FURTHER ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that appellees file a response to the emergency motion by August 22, 2025, and that appellants file any reply by August 27, 2025.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT: Clifton B. Cislak, Clerk

BY: /s/ Lynda M. Flippin Deputy Clerk

Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights v. Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coalition-for-humane-immigrant-rights-v-kristi-noem-in-her-official-cadc-2025.