Coakley v. Wheelock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Coakley v. Wheelock

240 A.D. 1001

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1933·Published

Opinion

— Order granting motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied, without costs, upon the ground that the discretion was not wisely exercised upon this record. In view of the foregoing decision the appeal from the order dated September 27, 1932, is dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order granting motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied, without costs, upon the ground that the discretion was not wisely exercised upon this record. In view of the foregoing decision the appeal from the order dated September 27, 1932, is dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Coakley v. Wheelock, 240 A.D. 1001 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

240 A.D. 1001 (Coakley v. Wheelock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.